02.08.2020, 22:35
А пруфы будут? Или мы наслово должны поверить?
Могу подтвердить, что видел тут этот комикс. Но также могу сказать, что полчаса поиска по тегам и попытки применить поиск по изображению в Гугле ни к чему не привели. Возможно, тот пост был удалён.
А, нет. 2pik ниже скинул ссылку на более ранний пост с этой картинкой.
Разрешите доебаться- в Древнем Риме оральный секс считался постыдным и низким.
Ну не скажи, с женщиной всё-таки не каждый извращенец готов был совокупляться. Это уже было слишком.
Будут, но не совсем те что я ожидал. Из того что я нашел на википедии- для свободного мужчины считалось постыдным нахождение в ПАССИВНОЙ роли во время секса (гетеро или гомо- без разницы). Как сюда отнести 69- я хз.
"Roman men were free to have sex with males of lower status without a perceived loss of masculinity, or even as an enhancement of it. However, those who took the receiving role in sex acts, sometimes referred to as the "passive" or "submissive" role, were disparaged as weak and effeminate, regardless of the sex of their partner (see the section below on cunnilungus and fellatio),[257] while having sex with males in the active position was proof of one's masculinity.[257] Mastery of one's own body was an aspect of the citizen's libertas, political liberty,[258] while the use of one's body to give pleasure to others, whether in homosexual or heterosexual relations, was servile. Laws such as the poorly understood Lex Scantinia and various pieces of Augustan moral legislation were meant to restrict same-sex activity among freeborn males, viewed as threatening a man's status and independence as a citizen."
"Roman men were free to have sex with males of lower status without a perceived loss of masculinity, or even as an enhancement of it. However, those who took the receiving role in sex acts, sometimes referred to as the "passive" or "submissive" role, were disparaged as weak and effeminate, regardless of the sex of their partner (see the section below on cunnilungus and fellatio),[257] while having sex with males in the active position was proof of one's masculinity.[257] Mastery of one's own body was an aspect of the citizen's libertas, political liberty,[258] while the use of one's body to give pleasure to others, whether in homosexual or heterosexual relations, was servile. Laws such as the poorly understood Lex Scantinia and various pieces of Augustan moral legislation were meant to restrict same-sex activity among freeborn males, viewed as threatening a man's status and independence as a citizen."
Чтобы написать коммент, необходимо залогиниться
